An Essay on Criticism

《An Essay on Criticism》是蒲伯Alexander Pope代表作，翻譯成中文《論批評》。

Pope's "Essay on Criticism" is a didactic poem in heroic couplets, begun, perhaps, as early as 1705, and published, anonymously, in 1711. The poetic essay was a relatively new genre, and the "Essay" itself was Pope's most ambitious work to that time. It was in part an attempt on Pope's part to identify and refine his own positions as poet and critic, and his response to an ongoing critical debate which centered on the question of whether poetry should be "natural" or written according to predetermined "artificial" rules inherited from the classical past.
The poem commences with a discussion of the rules of taste which ought to govern poetry, and which enable a critic to make sound critical judgements. In it Pope comments, too, upon the authority which ought properly to be accorded to the classical authors who dealt with the subject; and concludes (in an apparent attempt to reconcile the opinions of the advocates and opponents of rules) that the rules of the ancients are in fact identical with the rules of Nature: poetry and painting, that is, like religion and morality, actually reflect Natural Law. The "Essay on Criticism," then, is deliberately ambiguous: Pope seems, on the one hand, to admit that rules are necessary for the production of and criticism of poetry, but he also notes the existence of mysterious, apparently irrational qualities--"Nameless Graces," identified by terms such as "Happiness" and "Lucky Licence"--with which Nature is endowed, and which permit the true poetic genius, possessed of adequate "taste," to appear to transcend those same rules. The critic, of course, if he is to appreciate that genius, must possess similar gifts. True Art, in other words, imitates Nature, and Nature tolerates and indeed encourages felicitous irregularities which are in reality (because Nature and the physical universe are creations of God) aspects of the divine order of things which is eternally beyond human comprehension. Only God, the infinite intellect, the purely rational being, can appreciate the harmony of the universe, but the intelligent and educated critic can appreciate poetic harmonies which echo those in nature. Because his intellect and his reason are limited, however, and because his opinions are inevitably subjective, he finds it helpful or necessary to employ rules which are interpretations of the ancient principles of nature to guide him--though he should never be totally dependent upon them. We should note, in passing, that in "The Essay on Criticism" Pope is frequently concerned with "wit"--the word occurs once, on average, in every sixteen lines of the poem. What does he mean by it?
Pope then proceeds to discuss the laws by which a critic should be guided--insisting, as any good poet would, that critics exist to serve poets, not to attack them. He then provides, by way of example, instances of critics who had erred in one fashion or another. What, in Pope's opinion (here as elsewhere in his work) is the deadliest critical sin--a sin which is itself a reflection of a greater sin? All of his erring critics, each in their own way, betray the same fatal flaw.
The final section of the poem discusses the moral qualities and virtues inherent in the ideal critic, who is also the ideal man--and who, Pope laments, no longer exists in the degenerate world of the early eighteenth century.
來自於《英美文學選讀》對《論批評》的相關解釋與補充。
Alexander Pope(1688-1744) An Essay on Criticism is writen by Alexander Pope,it is a didactic poem written in heroic couplets.It consists of 744 lines and is divided into three parts.It sumps up the art of poetry as upheld and practised by the ancients like Aristotle,Horace,Boileau,etc.and the eighteeth century European classicists.The poet first laments the dearth of true taste in poetic criticism of his day and calls on people to turn to the old Greek and Roman writers for guidance.After a detailed account of the various problems in literary criticism,he offershis own ideas and presents the classical rules.At the end of the poem,he also traces the history of literary criticism from Aristotle down to Boileau and Roscommon.The poem,as a comprehensive study of the theories of literary criticism,exerted great influence upon Pope's contemporary writers in advocating the classical rules and popularizing the neoclassicist tradition in England.
The whole poem is written in a plain style,hardly containing any imagery or eloquence and therefore makes easy reading.（You have to have special permission to reprint this article,reproduction of material without witten permission is strictly prohibited.Contact me for permission to copy this article.This article or section may be inaccurate ,hope more experts can make comments on it.Thanks.）
<<論批評>>是用英雄雙韻體寫成的說教詩，共744行，分為三部分。這部作品集十八世紀歐洲古典主義作家及古希臘羅馬著名學者亞里士多德，霍拉斯，布瓦羅等人詩歌藝術之大成。詩人首先嘆息當詩歌評論界缺乏一種真實的文風，並號召人們向古希臘羅馬時期的作品尋求啟示。在詳述了文學評論界存在的各種問題之後，作者展示了自己的看法並提出古典文學的尺度。全詩結尾，作者還回憶了整個文學評論的歷史，從亞里士多德到布瓦羅（法國古典主義文學理論家）。蒲柏的這篇詩作：是對文學批評理論的全面研究，對同時期作家們產生了深遠的影響，倡導了古典主義標準，在英國普及了新古典主義。
全詩風格簡樸無華，不含任何比喻及文辭典故，因而很容易閱讀。(以上只是對主要內容的相關介紹，未經同意，禁止複製與轉載）。
參考了“英語語言學”網站 http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_59a22f2b0100axr2.html
《英美文學選讀》“Selected Readings In English And American Literatures”主編：張伯香 副主編：馬建君 胡曉紅