內容簡介
《解說立場的語言體現:以中文桌球電視直播節目為例》收集並轉寫了從1987年到2002年桌球比賽的部分錄音錄像，這些比賽由中央電視台不同的解說員加以解說。這一研究素材涵蓋了數個國際比賽，包括十多個小時的錄音錄像，10萬餘字的轉寫材料。資料庫的性質和大小使本研究能夠對解說立場的體現形式作一個較為完整的分析研究。作為初步的研究，《解說立場的語言體現:以中文桌球電視直播節目為例》進行了兩個具有一定深度的調查。第一個調查通過一場中外桌球選手之間的比賽，調查解說輪次的分布情況，因為解說輪次是中文桌球解說的基本語篇單位。為此，筆者專門選擇了一場比分非常接近的比賽。首先對這場比賽中比賽雙方各自的輪番技擊進行轉寫。有這一轉寫作為客觀和技術層面的參照，中文桌球現場解說中主觀和態度的層面得以統算出來。同時，藉助這一轉寫對解說輪次進行客觀的切分。其後，根據比賽中的得分和失分，檢查各個比賽輪次的解說是如何分配給比賽雙方的。這一依據擊技技術分析的客觀調查發現：在一場競賽表現非常相同的比賽中，解說輪次在中外比賽雙方的分布不是均勻的。基於第一個調查，第二個調查通過調查言語行為在一場比賽中兩個選手之間的分布，了解中文桌球現場解說中言語行為是如何體現解說立場的。依據塞爾言語行為的執行條件以及中國人中文語感的調查，在中文桌球現場解說中發現並定義了八種常用的言語行為。它們分別是“叫好、嘆惜、表揚、批評、建議、擔憂、找理由和期待”。調查素材加註上述言語行為後進行計算處理，以便觀察言語行為在中外球手之間有無分布差異。結果發現，分布的差異具有統計上的顯著意義。 {zzjj}
目錄
Acknowledgements
前言
Abstract
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 The Object of Research
1.2 Chinese Table Tennis Commentary
1.3 Stance in Chinese Table Tennis Commentary
1.4 General Approach
1.5 Organization of the Book
Chapter 2 Literature Review
2.1 Introduction
2.2 SportsannouncerTalk
2.2.1 SAT as a register or genre
2.2.2 Linguistic features of SAT
2.2.3 Key information tiers in a SAT
2.2.4 Methodology in SAT research
2.2.5 Professional experience in producing a SAT
2.2.6 Summary on the review of previous SAT researches
2.3 Linguistic Theory of Evaluation
2.3.1 Affection inlexis
2.3.2 Stance in sentence
2.3.3 Evaluation in discourse
2.4 Speech Act Theory
2.4.1 Why Speech Act Theory？
2.4.2 A brief introduction to Speech Act Theory
2.4.3 What other speech act does a constativeutteranceusually perform？
2.4.4 Is there an alternative way to classify speechActs？
2.4.5 What is the relationship between and among speech acts？
2.4.6 Summary on the review of Speech Act Theory
2.5 Discussion and Summary
2.5.1 Discussion
2.5.2 Summary
Chapter 3 Research Methodology
3.1 General Hypothesis
3.2 Data Collection, Transcription and Process
3.2.1 Data selection
3.2.2 Data transcription
3.2.3 Data processing
3.3 Competition in Table Tennis and Comparison inCITC
3.3.1 Aspects ofCTFC: objective or subjective
3.3.2 Comparative categories
3.4 Two Key Comparisons
3.4.1 Selection of point, stroke, or performance for evaluation
3.4.2 Speech act allocation and analysis
3.4.3 Evaluation patterns and their allocation
3.5 Discussion and Summary
3.5.1 Discussion
3.5.2 Summary
Chapter 4 A General Description ofCTTC
4.1 Introduction
4.2 General Description of CTTC
4.3 Basic Statistics
4.3.1 Constant frequency of different commentaries
4.3.2 Discourse usages and patterns
4.4 General Structure of a CT]？C
4.4.1 Information tiers
4.4.2 Evaluation distribution
4.5 Discussion and Summary
4.5.1 Discussion
4.5.2 Summary
Chapter 5 Selection of Points and Strokes for Commentary
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Basic Concepts
5.2.1 Basics of table tennis stroke
5.2.2 Alternate strokes
5.2.3 Pilot transcription of alternate strokes by the author
5.2.4 Transcription of alternate strokes by coaches
5.2.5 General summary
5.3 Competition Point and Commentary Unit
5.3.1 Score reports and game stages
5.3.2 Commentary unit
5.3.3 Stage contents and their organization
5.4 Stage Perspective and Commentary Stance
5.4.1 Basic perspectives
5.4.2 Stage perspective
5.4.3 Commentary distribution
5.4.4 Commentary stance
5.5 Summary and Discussion
5.5.1 Summary
5.5.2 Discussion
Chapter 6 Category and Distribution of Speech Acts
6.1 Introduction
6.2commentator, Audience and Player in a CTTC
6.3 Speech Acts in a CTTC
6.3.1 Definition and category
6.3.2 Speech act tagging
6.4 Distribution of Speech Acts in a CTTC
6.5 Macro Speech Act
6.6 Summary and Discussion
6.6.1 Summary
6.6.2 Discussion
Chapter 7 Conclusion
7.1 Major Findings and Contributions
7.2 Conclusions
7.3 Limitations and Further Studies
7.3.1 Limitations
7.3.2 Further studies
References
Appendix 1 Details of the Research Data
Appendix 2 Glossary of Table Tennis
Appendix 3 A Sample CTTC
Appendix 4 English Translation of the Sample CTTC
Appendix 5 Alternate Strokes Transcription
Appendix 6 Intuition Consultation
Appendix 7 Statistics of Speech Act Allocation
