31
The passage focuses on the requirement of workers from paragraph 1 to paragraph 3. They need meaning not only in physiology but in psychology. The author brings in a new idea that companies must design work in order to make work more meaningful. I feel it interesting. At the same time, I have some appetite for finding out the causal arrows between meaningful work and organization’s changing measures. In my view, nowadays, the expectations of quality of living of workers are increasing according to the living standard improvement. As a result, workers have more opinions and are likely to be treated as individuals.
There are still sorts of doubts. When I read the paragraph 1, the phrase “no longer” appeals to me. I know the meaning of it is the same to “not any longer”. I think the author puts “no longer” here in order to emphases on the past attitude of workers. Compared to past, great changes have taken place in workers. It seems that workers pay more attention to enjoy life now. They hope that their working environment fills with meaning for the sake of keeping balance of life. In my opinion, maybe the condition those workers are under pressure like other people and seek for opportunity to motivate results in requirement of working places improvement.
Turing to paragraph 3, the writer makes comments and judge on repetitive factory routines and put forward another point of view that the company must attach more importance to mental challenge. There comes a new question. I don’t understand what “an accepted standard” mean although I am familiar with the total words in the phrase. Looking over the article above, I find that the author talks about what will happen when there is too little or too much challenge. So I make an assumption that “an accepted standard” is closely related to appropriate challenge, nether too little, nor too much.
29雲朵飄飄31.2L.txt 324
The passage focuses on the requirement of workers from paragraph 1 to paragraph 3. They need meaning not only in physiology but in psychology. The author brings in a new idea that companies must design work in order to make work more meaningful. I feel it interesting. At the same time, I have some appetite for finding out the causal arrows between meaningful work and organization’s changing measures. In my view, nowadays, the expectations of quality of living of workers are increasing according to the living standard improvement.
As a result, workers have more opinions and are likely to be treated as individuals.
There are still sorts of doubts. When I read the paragraph 1, the phrase “no longer” appeals to me. I know the meaning of it is the same to “not any longer”. I think the author puts “no longer” here in order to emphases(emphasize) on the past attitude of workers. Compared to past, great changes have taken place in workers. It seems that workers pay more attention to enjoy(enjoying) life now. They hope that their working environment fills(fill) with meaning for the sake of keeping balance of life. In my opinion, maybe the condition those workers are under pressure like other people and seek for opportunity to motivate results in requirement of working places improvement.
Turing to (the)paragraph 3, the writer makes comments and judge on repetitive factory routines and put forward another point of view that the company must attach more importance to mental challenge. There comes a new question. I don’t understand what “an accepted standard” mean(meaning) although I am familiar with the total words in the phrase. Looking over the article above, I find that the author talks about what will happen when there is too little or too much challenge. So I make an assumption that “an accepted standard” is closely related to appropriate challenge, nether too little, nor too much.
GOOD WRITING!
