When I was reading [read] the ninth paragraph, I was very interested in “weasel claim”. What is the weasel claim? I do not know what is weasel [what weasel is] before I read this paragraph. From this paragraph I know that weasel not only eat [eats] eggs on the sly but also try [tries] to deceive people into considering the eggs is right. In the second sentence I found an interesting word—after. We know after is usually used as preposition. But here the meaning of the [delete the] after is not it. From the sentence’s meaning I guess that we could understand it like based on—“weasel word” is aptly named based on the egg-eating habits of weasels. In the last sentence I stop reading to look at “disintegrate”. I look it up in online dictionary and the dictionary translates as “to break up, or make something break up, into very small pieces”. But I can not understand it.
In paragraph 10 the author talk [talks] about the “water is wet claim”. I found this claim is belong to [belongs to] the second rule of advertising-claim, which the author talks about in [the] seventh paragraph.
In paragraph 11 the “so what” claim is appeared. In the last sentence the word “presence” puzzles [puzzled] me. In my idea [opinion] the presence means “when someone or something is present in a particular place”. But why the author uses it here[why does the author use it here]? Emphasize? I don’t know.
In paragraph 12 I meet the “scientific or statistical claim”. Firstly I want to say I am of the opinion that I don’t like this kind of ads, because I think this ad is lie. No One Knows the proof or numbers which the ad gives is true except the producer. So I can not agrees with the author’s idea that the use of scientific proof or specific numbers make the claim far more believable than if it were Taken Out.
The “compliment the consumer” claim is appeared in paragraph 13. This is the kind of ad which I could only accept. Because only in this kind of ad that we could not listening falsehood. In my idea honesty is very important.
In paragraph 14 the author talks about the “rhetorical question”. The structure of this ad is that firstly someone will ask which is good or best, which is you wanted to buy. Follow it other people will tell you they want [to] use it or that. I do not like it, this is your idea not me, do not speak it for me.
